Cosmos Fund I: Housing For US Veterans

Streszczenie

Opportunity Type

Equity Investment, Investment Funds

Wielkość inwestycji

USD 30 M

Kraj podatkowy

Problem

  • 33,000 U.S. veterans are homeless. 

  • Federal housing funding is in place, but housing supply accepting vouchers is insufficient, especially in high-demand urban markets.

  • The constraint is availability and execution, not capital.

Solution

  • COSMOS Fund I acquires and operates housing in Parkchester, Bronx (NYC) and leases it under HUD-VASH.

  • Converts federal rental commitments do permanent housing through disciplined private capital.

Business Model (Key Numbers)

  • Assets: ~100 condominium units

  • Location: Parkchester, Bronx — near-full occupancy (~1% vacancy)

  • Entry pricing: ~$350/ft² vs ~$1,000/ft² in comparable NYC sub-20-minute markets

  • Rent source: HUD-VASH Housing Assistance Payments (government-anchored)

  • Leverage: 65% baseline LTV (70% cap), fixed-rate, amortizing

  • Reserves: $5,000 per unit locked + fund-level buffers

  • Target returns (illustrative):

    • 7-yr: ~18–19% net IRR, ~ multiple

    • 10-yr: ~20% net IRR, ~5.5× multiple

Team & Execution

  • 14+ years operating in Parkchester

  • 340+ units under management in the same community

  • Condo board representation, reducing HOA and execution risk

  • Founders personally invested, fully aligned with LP capital

Why Now

  • Veteran homelessness persists due to housing shortages, not funding gaps

  • HUD-VASH: 49-year, bipartisan program with stable payment history

  • NYC rental markets at historic tightness

  • Transit upgrade under construction near Parkchester (upside, not base case)

No videos found.

Dokumenty

Aby pobrać dokumenty projektowe, prosimy  zapisać się Lub zalogować

Finanse

Poproś o dostęp do data room, w razie chęci zapoznania się z projektem, należy posiadać aktualny dowód środków na platformie. 

Opis

Government backed Rent | Defensive Income

Strategy Overview

  • Asset Acquisition: The Fund will acquire 100 condominium units in Parkchester, Bronx (New York City), a large, established residential community. All units will be leased to U.S. veterans through the HUD-VASH program (a federal rent voucher system), ensuring a stable tenant base with government-backed rental income.
  • Financing Approach: The acquisition will be funded with conservative leverage – fixed-rate, fully amortizing debt at approximately 65–70% loan-to-value (LTV). This moderate debt level aims to enhance returns while maintaining comfortable debt service coverage.
  • Hold Period: The Fund targets a 7-year hold, with flexibility for up to three one-year extensions (maximum 10 years total) to optimize the timing of exit and avoid forced sale in unfavorable market conditions.
  • Ownership Structure: Investor ownership is tokenized, with limited partner (LP) interests recorded on a digital ledger. This structure provides transparent and efficient ownership tracking, and enables direct peer-to-peer transfers of LP interests (subject to securities restrictions), while all cash flows move through the Fund’s traditional bank accounts for security and control.

Target Outcomes

  • Target Returns: Projected investor returns include a net internal rate of return (IRR) of approximately 18–20% and a net equity multiple of roughly 3.0× over the 7-year base case. In an extended 10-year scenario, the net equity multiple is estimated around 5×–6× with a similar IRR in the high teens. These targets are net of fees and based on conservative assumptions.
  • Cash Yield Growth: The Fund is designed to produce steady cash yield on equity, starting at roughly 6% annually in the initial years. As rents grow and debt is paid down over time, the annual cash yield is projected to rise to approximately 30% by year 10 (if the hold period is extended), significantly enhancing investor cash flow in later years.
  • Conservative Underwriting: All projections are grounded in conservative underwriting. The business case assumes a 5% vacancy rate (economic vacancy), maintains at least $5,000 per unit in reserves for repairs and contingencies, and assumes no gains from refinancing or other speculative events in the financial model. This prudent approach is intended to ensure that target returns can be achieved under routine operating conditions, with any additional upside (e.g. from market appreciation or transit improvements) providing potential outperformance.

Key Differentiators

  • Government-Backed Rent Stream: The Fund’s income is underpinned by HUD-VASH vouchers, which pair Department of Housing and Urban Development rent subsidies with Veterans Affairs support. Rent is paid via Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) from local housing authorities, effectively a federal government-backed payment stream. This arrangement results in highly reliable collections, low delinquency, and reduced vacancy risk (historic occupancy for HUD-VASH housing is very high).
  • Below-Market Entry Pricing: The acquisition price is approximately $350 per square foot, which is well below the prevailing ~$1,000/ft² valuations in other New York City submarkets that offer under-20-minute commute times to Manhattan. This favorable basis provides room for value appreciation as the Parkchester units re-price toward levels of comparable transit-accessible neighborhoods. In other words, the Fund is buying in at a significant discount to comparable assets, positioning investors to benefit from a potential price convergence over time.
  • Transit Catalyst Upside: A new Metro-North rail station is under construction in the immediate vicinity of Parkchester, scheduled for completion around 2026–2027. This station will dramatically cut the commute to Midtown Manhattan (Penn Station) from roughly ~58 minutes currently to about 18 minutes. Shorter travel times are expected to increase housing demand and property values in the area. The Fund’s base-case projections do not rely on this improvement, treating it as pure upside – but if realized, this transit upgrade could accelerate rent growth and asset appreciation beyond the conservative underwriting case.
  • Aligned and Experienced Sponsorship: The General Partner and operating principals are investing significant personal capital alongside LPs, ensuring full alignment of interest between the sponsor and investors. The management team has deep on-the-ground experience in Parkchester, with a track record of owning and managing hundreds of units in the community over the past decade. This local presence (including representation on the condominium board) and operational expertise enable efficient execution, favorable vendor relationships, and proactive risk management for the portfolio.

Liquidity and Reporting

  • Transferability: The Fund’s tokenized structure enables peer-to-peer transfer of LP interests on a regulated digital ledger, should an interested buyer be available. This provides investors with a potential (though not guaranteed) path to liquidity by selling their interests directly to other qualified investors, subject to applicable transfer restrictions (e.g. holding periods and investor eligibility rules).
  • Transparent Reporting: Investors will receive regular reporting to track performance. Quarterly Net Asset Value (NAV) updates will be provided, based on updated appraisals and portfolio metrics. Along with NAV, the Fund will report key performance indicators each quarter – including occupancy rates, debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), reserves per unit, acquisition progress, and other relevant metrics. Annual audited financial statements and tax documents (K-1s for U.S. investors) will also be provided. This robust reporting framework ensures institutional-grade transparency into the Fund’s operations and financial health.

Przegląd rynku

Residential Rental Market Trends in NY

Parkchester sits within the Bronx, a borough currently experiencing one of the tightest rental markets in New York City. Citywide apartment vacancy rates are near historic lows (~2.8–3.0%), underscoring intense demand and limited supply[1][2]. The Bronx leads in occupancy – effectively full at ~1% vacancy, meaning virtually every available unit is leased[3]. Parkchester reflects this dynamic: only ~8 rental listings were on the market recently, with a median asking rent around $2,197[4]. Such scant availability signals robust demand and high occupancy in this community.

HUDVASH_ESG_Investment_RE_Fund_Parkchester_Analysis

Rental prices have surged to record levels across NYC. As of early 2025, the median asking rent in Manhattan reached about $4,500 (with average 1BR rents ~$4,640)[5], and Brooklyn’s median was roughly $3,748[6]. Queens asking rents have also exceeded $3,300 on average[7]. By comparison, Parkchester’s median rent of $2.2K per month[4] highlights its relative affordability, even as Bronx rents have climbed rapidly. In fact, the Bronx saw the largest rent growth of any borough in recent years – +61% over the last 6 years[8] – pushing the median asking rent to about $3,132 as of mid-2025[8]. This growth follows a post-2020 spike: Bronx rents jumped over 40% from 2020–2025[9]. Rent increases have since moderated (only ~0.7% early-2025 uptick in the Bronx[9]), but rents remain at all-time highs. Even traditionally affordable areas are seeing record rents[10]. Today, Manhattan rents still average roughly 40–50% higher than Bronx rents[11], yet the gap has narrowed amid the Bronx’s recent surge. For Parkchester specifically, rents are near their highest levels on record, though still offering a discount to the city core.

Despite robust rent growth, Parkchester and the Bronx maintain a pricing advantage on a per-square-foot basis. Parkchester units (often one- and two-bedroom condos in mid-rise buildings) have asking rents that translate to ~$30–$35 per sq. ft. annually, significantly lower than premium Manhattan neighborhoods that routinely achieve double that rate. Occupancy in Parkchester remains very high, reflecting strong tenant demand for its more attainable rents. In sum, the residential rental trend in Parkchester is one of rising rents and constrained supply, but with absolute rent levels that are still moderate compared to Manhattan and Brooklyn. This combination yields a compelling value proposition for renters – and by extension, landlords – in Parkchester’s submarket.

Macroeconomic & Demographic Trends

Aerial view of Parkchester’s 129-acre planned community in the Bronx, showing its cluster of mid-rise apartment buildings amid surrounding neighborhoods. Parkchester’s market must be understood in the context of broader economic and demographic currents in New York City. Affordability is a central concern: as of mid-2025, the median NYC rent consumes ~55% of a typical household’s income[12] – far above the 30% guideline – and the strain is most severe in the Bronx. In the Bronx, median asking rents now equate to an astonishing ~82% of household income (versus ~57% in Manhattan)[13]. Incomes in the Bronx are lower (median ~$46K) and rent burdens higher, even as the borough historically offered the cheapest rents. This means demand for affordable units is intense, but it also underscores the importance of rental housing that remains within reach of local workers. Parkchester plays a key role here, providing reasonably priced housing (relative to NYC norms) for working- and middle-class residents. Notably, even at ~$2.2K/month, Parkchester’s median rent is below the city median – a rarity in a city where 70% of households rent and many areas have become unaffordable[14]. The need for housing at attainable price points supports sustained occupancy in Parkchester, though it also highlights renters’ sensitivity to income trends and employment stability.

Employment and population trends in NYC further bolster the Parkchester thesis. New York City has rebounded strongly from the pandemic: by March 2025 the region reached 4.22 million private-sector jobs (4.82M including government), exceeding pre-2020 peaks[15]. Crucially, many of these job gains are in high-paying industries (finance, tech, professional services)[15], which fuels housing demand across the city. While Manhattan captures a large share of these jobs, the Bronx benefits indirectly – through secondary employment growth and via commuters seeking more affordable residences. The Bronx had been enjoying steady population growth from the late 1990s up to 2020[16], and after a brief pandemic dip, all NYC boroughs resumed growth by 2023-2024[17]. This return of population (NYC added ~87,000 residents in the year ending July 2024)[18] signals that the city’s allure remains intact. Parkchester’s family-friendly, community-oriented environment (noted for its landscaped oval, parks, and retail amenities) positions it well to capture households who might be priced out of Brooklyn or Queens. Demographically, the Bronx skews younger than Manhattan and has a large immigrant community, contributing to household formation and rental demand. An influx of new residents, from returning young professionals to immigrant families, continues to drive demand for Bronx housing – particularly in well-connected, services-rich neighborhoods like Parkchester.

HUDVASH_ESG_Investment_RE_Fund_Parkchester_Analysis_Employment.png

Perhaps the most game-changing macro development for Parkchester is infrastructure investment. The MTA’s $3 billion Penn Station Access project will create four new Metro-North commuter rail stations in the East Bronx (including one at Parkchester/Van Nest), slated for completion around 2027[19][20]. This new transit link is set to transform Parkchester’s connectivity. Currently, residents rely on the <em>6 Train</em> subway, taking about 50–60 minutes to reach Midtown Manhattan. The upcoming Metro-North stop will offer a direct ride into Penn Station (Midtown West) in an estimated ~18 minutes[21] – effectively putting Parkchester just a quick express ride from Manhattan’s core. This dramatic cut in commute time (a ~40-minute reduction each way) is expected to elevate Parkchester’s appeal for commuters and significantly improve its “price-to-access” proposition[21]. Similar transit improvements in NYC have historically driven rent and price growth in newly linked neighborhoods, as shorter commutes broaden the pool of renters and buyers. While the full impact will unfold over the long term, investors are already viewing the new station as a catalyst that could unlock Parkchester’s value. Importantly, current pricing in Parkchester does not yet fully reflect this future convenience – presenting a potential arbitrage opportunity (as discussed below). In addition to transit, ongoing local initiatives (e.g. NYC’s “City of Yes” zoning reforms and proposed tax abatements) aim to spur housing development in outer boroughs[20]. Over time, such pro-housing policies and infrastructure upgrades should support the Bronx’s growth, making areas like Parkchester even more integrated into the city’s economic fabric.

Investment Fundamentals: Values & Yields

From an investment perspective, Parkchester offers attractive fundamentals relative to more established NYC submarkets. One key indicator is capitalization rates (cap rates) – i.e. initial yield on rental property. In today’s market, NYC multifamily cap rates average ~5–6%[22] after rising with interest rates in 2022–23. However, there is a sharp bifurcation: prime Manhattan assets still trade at low yields (often sub-4% for trophy properties)[23], whereas outer-borough and secondary market cap rates lie in the mid-5% to 6%+ range[22][23]. The Bronx, in particular, has seen cap rates in the high-5% to 6% range for stabilized multifamily deals, reflecting both higher perceived risk and greater income yield[22]. Parkchester’s condo units, when rented, similarly demonstrate above-average yield metrics. At a median sale price of ~$250,000 per unit (roughly $349 per square foot in recent listings)[24] and median rents around $2,200, the price-to-rent ratio is on the order of 9–10X (annual rent), implying a gross yield in the high single-digits. Even after accounting for common charges and expenses, this suggests cap rates that can exceed 5% – a healthy spread versus Manhattan’s ~3–4% on comparable units[23]. In other words, investors can acquire income streams in Parkchester at a far lower multiple of rent (and higher cap rate) than in Manhattan or Brooklyn, enhancing cash-on-cash returns and cushioning against interest costs. This yield premium compensates for factors like the Bronx’s historically higher perceived risk and lower liquidity, but it also highlights an arbitrage opportunity if those risk perceptions change.

Perhaps the most striking metric is Parkchester’s pricing per square foot relative to its transit accessibility. Currently, Parkchester condos trade around $350 per sq. ft.[25]. By contrast, apartments in “sub-20-minute” commutable neighborhoods of Manhattan, Brooklyn or Queens often command on the order of $1,000 per sq. ft.[25] (with Manhattan condos averaging $1,600–$2,000/ft² in many areas[26]). Even other gentrifying Bronx areas have seen multifamily trades above $500/ft² for free-market product in recent years.

This ~3× valuation gap – Parkchester at ~$350 vs. ~$1,000 in comparably transit-proximate locales[25] – signals a potential price-to-access mispricing. Parkchester’s residents will enjoy essentially the same 15–20 minute Midtown commute as many prime neighborhoods once the new rail station is operational, yet current pricing has not caught up to that reality[21][25]. For long-term investors, this suggests room for Parkchester values to appreciate faster than the city average as market perceptions evolve. Indeed, the Bronx has already been on an upswing: home prices in the Bronx climbed about 38% from 2010 to 2020[27], outpacing Queens and Staten Island, and more recently Bronx properties have transacted at discounts due to regulatory overhang – providing savvy investors a low basis. Over the last 6 years, even Manhattan’s rent growth was only ~2% (stagnant due to a mid-decade dip) while the Bronx’s rent growth exceeded 60%[28][8].

HUDVASH_ESG_Investment_RE_Fund_Parkchester_Analysis_Rent and Vacancy

 

Looking forward, long-term appreciation prospects in Parkchester appear strong as the area benefits from Bronx-wide growth drivers but starts from a low price base. The Bronx’s outlook is “exceptionally bright,” according to market analysts, given a convergence of pro-housing policy and transformative transit investments anchoring future growth[20].

Crucially, we approach these fundamentals with a balanced, data-driven view. Parkchester’s relative discount comes with considerations: historically, the Bronx has had higher unemployment and lower income levels than Manhattan, which can cap rent growth and resale velocity. Regulatory changes (e.g. 2019 rent stabilization laws) also hit Bronx multifamily assets particularly hard, as evidenced by some distressed sales at <$130/sf for rent-regulated buildings[29]. However, Parkchester’s niche – free-market condominium units in a well-run complex – sidesteps many of those regulatory risks while aligning with the city’s urgent need for middle-income housing. Occupancy has proven resilient (boosted further by programs like HUD-VASH vouchers for veterans), and collections are reliable even through economic cycles. Meanwhile, the broader capital markets are stabilizing: after a period of cap rate expansion, NYC multifamily values have found a floor in mid-2025, and any future interest rate relief could spur cap rate compression (i.e. rising values) given the city’s strong fundamentals[30][31]. For an institutional investor or family office, the risk/reward profile in Parkchester is thus compelling. You obtain a high current yield and significant appreciation upside (from both operational improvements and market re-rating) – all against the backdrop of New York City’s deep rental demand and new infrastructure that is set to bridge Parkchester’s value gap. In summary, Parkchester represents a case of price-to-access arbitrage: a well-located New York City community priced at a fraction of peers, with market trends and forthcoming transit connectivity serving as catalysts for value convergence in the years ahead[32][25].

Sources: City of New York, NYU Furman Center, MTA, Realtor.com, MMCG Invest (2025 Multifamily Report), Brevitas (NYC Market Update 2025), Ariel Property Advisors (2025 Bronx Report), and TIRIOS Capital research. All data as of 2024–2025. Citations available upon request.[3][8][21][25]

Competition Analysis

For an LP evaluating a Bronx/Parkchester-focused residential strategy, the “competition” is best framed across three buckets:

  1. NYC-focused private real estate funds pursuing multifamily or residential income (core, core-plus, value-add).

  2. Affordable / voucher-anchored housing operators (Section 8 / voucher / supportive housing models) competing for similar tenant channels and municipal program bandwidth.

  3. Public market substitutes (REITs and listed housing vehicles) competing for investor capital rather than for the same assets.

Cosmos Fund I’s core positioning combines (i) voucher-anchored demand, (ii) unit-by-unit condo ownership in a professionally governed mega-community, and (iii) a transit-upside catalyst that is explicitly treated as upside (not required for base-case)

1) Direct Competitors: NYC Private Real Estate Funds (Multifamily / Residential)

What they do:
Most NYC private funds target multifamily or mixed-use residential assets across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and select Bronx submarkets. Many employ a value-add thesis (renovations, operational improvements, leasing strategy changes) and often rely on one or more of: rent growth, cap-rate compression, and leverage.

How Cosmos differs (competitive edge):

  • Entry basis / mispricing: The Fund’s thesis is anchored in buying Parkchester around ~$350/ft² versus ~$1,000/ft² in other NYC neighborhoods with similar (future) commute characteristicsThat differential is central to the “price-to-access” convergence thesis.

  • Income quality: Instead of relying purely on market-rent tenants, Cosmos is structured around HUD-VASH voucher tenancy (government-administered housing assistance payments), designed to improve collections reliability and reduce vacancy risk relative to many conventional renter profiles

  • Underwriting posture: The base case is built on 5% vacancy, elevated reserves including $5,000 per unit locked, and fixed-rate amortizing debt with 65% baseline LTV / 70% cap to avoid forced sales and reduce refinancing dependency

Where competitors may look better:

  • Prime Manhattan/Brooklyn managers may offer larger institutional platforms, more diversified asset types, and deeper long-term relationships with major lenders and brokers.

  • Some competitors may have lower operational complexity if they avoid regulated programs or inspection cadence requirements.

2) Strategy-Level Competitors: Bronx Multifamily / Affordable Housing Operators

What they do:
A number of Bronx-focused groups run strategies using either:

  • regulated rent-stabilized multifamily,

  • affordable housing programs, or

  • voucher-oriented leasing (e.g., Section 8 / supportive housing variations).

Cosmos’ specific differentiators within this bucket:

  • Asset form: condo ownership vs building-level multifamily. Cosmos acquires condominium units in Parkchester rather than purchasing an entire building

    This can reduce exposure to certain building-level structural risks but introduces HOA governance and assessment considerations (addressed via reserves, local operating depth, and board presence)

  • Operational specialization: The operating model is explicitly designed around HUD-VASH processes, including inspections and program administration, supported by an experienced local operator with long Parkchester track record and board representation

  • Market fallback: If program dynamics change, the fund thesis highlights a fallback to private tenancy as an additional risk mitigant (though not a guarantee of equivalent economics).

Where competitors may look better:

  • Some affordable-housing developers access direct subsidies and may capture development spreads or long-term contracts.

  • Operators owning entire buildings may have more control over capex planning and building systems than condo owners.


3) “Competing for LP Capital”: Public REITs and Liquid Real Estate Vehicles

What they do:
Public REITs (residential and diversified) provide liquidity and simplicity. They are common substitutes for investors seeking real estate exposure without private fund lockups.

Why Cosmos is positioned differently:

  • Return profile and structure: Cosmos targets ~18–19% net IRR in a 7-year base case with ~3× equity multiple (and a longer-hold scenario targeting higher multiple), under conservative assumptions and without refi upside in base case

  • Income mechanism: Cash flows are primarily tied to residential rents, with a key differentiator being voucher-anchored payments for a meaningful portion of the rent stream

  • Transparency and investor ops: Quarterly NAV methodology and KPI reporting are embedded in policy (with defined triggers for intra-quarter updates on material changes)

    CM NAV Policy supported by a tokenized cap table mechanism that improves record accuracy and administration without changing cash custody

    CM Why tokenization

Where REITs may be superior:

  • Daily liquidity and lower operational complexity for the investor.

  • Potentially lower idiosyncratic neighborhood/HOA concentration risk.

Competitive Comparison: Cosmos vs Typical NYC Alternatives (Qualitative)

A) Entry Basis & Upside Drivers

  • Cosmos: priced as a “long-commute” neighborhood while a near-core connection is being built; upside treated as optional

  • Many NYC competitors: buy already “discovered” markets; upside relies more on renovations, rent growth, and cap rate movements.

B) Income Stability

  • Cosmos: HUD-VASH voucher flow and structured operating processes aim to stabilize occupancy/collections

  • Typical market-rent funds: more exposed to tenant credit dispersion and macro volatility.

C) Risk Posture & Leverage

  • Cosmos: fixed-rate amortizing debt, max 70% LTV, DSCR discipline, elevated locked reserves

  • Some competitors: may use floating-rate bridge debt or heavier refinance assumptions.

D) Liquidity and Reporting

  • Cosmos: peer-to-peer transfers possible if a buyer exists; quarterly NAV and KPI-based reporting

  • Public substitutes: daily liquidity but less direct control over asset-level exposure.

In the NYC competitive set, Cosmos Fund I sits at the intersection of (i) outer-borough affordability demand, (ii) government-linked rent mechanics, and (iii) a transit catalyst that can unlock price-to-access convergence, while maintaining a conservative underwriting posture (vacancy, reserves, and fixed amortizing leverage) designed to reduce downside volatility. The primary “competition” is not one identical fund, but rather a set of substitutes—NYC value-add funds, voucher-oriented housing operators, and liquid REIT exposure—each trading off liquidity, control, yield stability, and entry basis.

Finanse

Tylko inwestorzy mogą przeglądać dane finansowe.

Major Benefits in this Opportunity

Investment Rationale – Executive Summary

Cosmos Fund I offers investors a rare opportunity to access New York City residential real estate at a materially discounted entry point, combined with government-backed income stability I embedded upside from a major infrastructure upgrade. The strategy targets Parkchester in the Bronx—an established, professionally managed community that is currently priced like a “long-commute” neighborhood but is on track to become a sub-20-minute market to Midtown Manhattan once the new Metro-North station comes online. Investors benefit from predictable HUD-VASH rental income paid by the U.S. government, conservative leverage, and disciplined operations, while retaining meaningful appreciation potential as pricing converges toward comparable NYC submarkets. The fund is structured to prioritize downside protection first and upside second, making it particularly attractive for family offices and long-term capital seeking resilient, inflation-hedged returns.

Why Invest – Key Points

1. Mispriced Entry in a Global City

  • Acquire NYC residential assets at ~$350/ft² versus ~$1,000/ft² in comparable sub-20-minute Manhattan-access neighborhoods.

  • Structural “price-to-access” gap creates room for long-term convergence.

2. Government-Backed Income Stability

  • Rents paid primarily via HUD-VASH Housing Assistance Payments from the U.S. government.

  • Near-zero credit risk, historically reliable through economic cycles.

  • Long-term rent growth history (~7%+ annually) embedded in the program.

3. Transit-Driven Upside (Not in Base Case)

  • New Metro-North station expected to reduce commute from ~58 minutes to ~18 minutes.

  • Historically, such transit upgrades materially increase demand, rents, and values.

  • Base case underwriting does not rely on this upside—making it optional, not required.

4. Conservative, Downside-First Structuring

  • Fixed-rate, amortizing debt with ~65% baseline LTV (70% cap).

  • $5,000 per unit locked reserves plus additional operating/capex buffers.

  • Underwritten at 5% vacancy, despite structurally higher expected occupancy.

5. Strong Cash Yield with Compounding Effect

  • Initial cash yield ~6% with meaningful annual growth as rents rise and debt amortizes.

  • Modeled outcomes of ~18–19% net IRR (7-year) and higher multiples with longer hold.

6. Experienced, Aligned Local Execution

  • Sponsor and operating partner with 14+ years in Parkchester, managing hundreds of units.

  • Direct condo board presence reduces HOA risk and improves operational control.

  • GP co-investment ensures alignment with LP capital.

7. Institutional Transparency & Optional Liquidity

  • Quarterly NAV and KPI reporting.

  • Tokenized ownership enables peer-to-peer transfers if a buyer exists (no liquidity promise, but reduced friction).

Who is it Ideal for?

Ideal Investor Profile

Cosmos Fund I is designed for investors who prioritize capital preservation, predictable income, and long-term compounding, while still seeking meaningful upside from structural market mispricing. It is not a speculative or short-term trade; it is a patient capital strategy with institutional risk controls and asymmetric return potential.

Below are the ideal investor categories for whom this opportunity is particularly well-suited:

1. Family Offices (Primary Target)

Why it fits

  • Preference for real assets with downside protection

  • Desire for stable, inflation-linked income rather than pure growth

  • Long investment horizons (7–10 years align well with family capital mandates)

Value Proposition

  • Government-backed rent stream reduces operational and credit risk

  • Conservative leverage and locked reserves protect principal

  • Embedded appreciation from transit and market convergence without requiring leverage-driven risk

Typical Profile

  • Multi-generational capital

  • USD exposure preferred

  • Looking for alternatives to over-priced core real estate or low-yield bonds

2. High-Net-Worth Individuals (HNWIs) Seeking Passive Income

Why it fits

  • Investors who want hands-off real estate exposure without tenant, financing, or regulatory complexity

  • Those priced out of direct NYC ownership or unwilling to manage assets personally

Value Proposition

  • Access to NYC real estate starting at a $50,000 minimum, rather than buying a full unit

  • Cash flow profile superior to most residential investments at comparable risk

  • Diversification across ~100 units instead of single-asset concentration

Typical Profile

  • Entrepreneurs, executives, professionals

  • Already exposed to equities/crypto and seeking stabilizing income

  • Comfortable with illiquidity in exchange for higher risk-adjusted returns

3. International Investors Seeking U.S. Dollar Income (Reg S)

Why it fits

  • Strong appeal for investors outside the U.S. looking for USD-denominated, rule-of-law assets

  • Preference for stable jurisdictions over emerging-market volatility

Value Proposition

  • Exposure to U.S. government-backed cash flows

  • Clear legal structure and institutional reporting

  • No reliance on local currency strength or domestic policy regimes

Typical Profile

  • Middle East, Europe, Asia-based investors

  • Capital preservation–oriented

  • Interested in U.S. real estate but cautious about operating risk

4. Investors Reallocating from Bonds or Yield-Focused Products

Why it fits

  • Suitable replacement for low-yield fixed income or credit strategies

  • Income backed by real assets and indexed to inflation rather than fixed coupons

Value Proposition

  • Cash flow that grows over time, unlike bonds

  • Comparable or lower risk than many high-yield debt products

  • Hard asset hedge against inflation and monetary expansion

Typical Profile

  • Retirees or near-retirement investors

  • Conservative portfolios seeking yield with asset backing

  • Institutions or individuals reducing duration risk

5. ESG-Oriented and Impact-Aware Investors (Secondary Fit)

Why it fits

  • Delivers measurable social impact without sacrificing return discipline

  • Housing U.S. veterans via a long-standing federal program

Value Proposition

  • Impact is a by-product of the strategy, not a return trade-off

  • Suitable for investors who want ESG exposure that still meets financial benchmarks

Typical Profile

  • Foundations, mission-aligned capital

  • Family offices with social impact mandates

  • Investors who value “impact with underwriting discipline”

Who This Is Not Ideal For

  • Investors requiring short-term liquidity or guaranteed exits

  • Speculators seeking rapid price appreciation

  • Investors uncomfortable with a 7–10 year hold

  • Those looking for development or high-risk value-add exposure

Cosmos Fund I is ideal for long-term, patient investors who want stable, government-anchored income today and asymmetric upside tomorrow—without taking development risk or relying on aggressive leverage.

Zarządzanie i zespół

No management team information provided.

Potencjalne zachęty do inwestowania w

Zachęty inwestycyjne w

Możesz zostać zakwalifikowany do...

No investment incentives found.

Możesz sprawdzić dostępne opcje finansowania za pośrednictwem naszej platformy internetowej, połączonej z ponad 4500 lokalnymi bankami i pożyczkodawcami na całym świecie.

No bank options found.

Our network of Advisors will help you in gaining the benefits from Tax incentives.

No tax incentives found.

Other Options and Incentives.

Ryzyko związane z tą szansą

Są to ryzyka, które zdaniem naszych ekspertów należy wziąć pod uwagę przed dokonaniem inwestycji w tym przypadku...

Cosmos Fund is designed as a conservative, government-backed real estate strategy, but it is not risk-free. The principal risks are operational and structural rather than speculative. 1. Program & Compliance Risk (HUD-VASH) Rental income depends on continued compliance with HUD-VASH rules, inspections (HQS), and administrative processes at the local housing authority level. Failed inspections, paperwork delays, or policy changes can temporarily defer payments. Why it matters: Cash flow is conditional, not automatic. Mitigant: Dedicated compliance processes, inspection discipline, reserves. 2. Operational Execution Risk The strategy relies on scaled, repeatable execution—leasing, inspections, turns, HOA coordination, and vendor management. Poor execution erodes the advantages of voucher-backed rent. Why it matters: This is an operations-driven fund, not passive buy-and-hold. Mitigant: Experienced on-the-ground operating partner, standardized workflows, KPIs. 3. HOA / Condominium Risk Condominium ownership introduces exposure to HOA fees, special assessments, and governance decisions beyond the fund’s direct control. Why it matters: Unexpected assessments or fee inflation can compress NOI. Mitigant: Strong HOA reserves, board representation, per-unit locked reserves. 4. Leverage & Financing Risk Although leverage is conservative, debt remains a fixed obligation. DSCR pressure can arise if rents lag or costs rise faster than expected. Why it matters: Leverage magnifies downside in stress scenarios. Mitigant: Fixed-rate, amortizing debt, DSCR guardrails, moderate LTV. 5. Market & Exit Risk Real estate values are cyclical. Exit pricing, cap rates, and liquidity conditions may be unfavorable at the planned exit window. Why it matters: NAV is an estimate; realized sale prices can differ. Mitigant: Long fund term with extensions, multiple exit paths, no forced sales assumption. 6. Liquidity Risk Interests are in a private fund. There is no guaranteed secondary liquidity, and transfers are peer-to-peer only if a buyer exists. Why it matters: Capital is illiquid during the fund life. Mitigant: Long-term horizon, clear disclosure, optional transfer rails (not a promise).
Nowe aktualizacje dotyczące tej możliwości

W tej sekcji znajdziesz najnowsze zmiany i aktualizacje dotyczące tej możliwości inwestycyjnej. 

Support at Najafi capital

Jesteśmy tutaj, aby pomóc

Porozmawiaj ze swoim dedykowanym doradcą na temat swojej prośby.

Dodatkowe koszty transakcyjne w

Each Transaction has some additional hidden costs, that the investors should know. At Najafi Capital we tried to Unveil them as much as possible. The non percentage values in the report are in USD.

No additional costs found.

Przedstawione koszty wskazują typowe scenariusze, ale rzeczywiste wydatki mogą się różnić w zależności od kilku czynników, w tym pilności transakcji, narodowości zaangażowanych stron i innych szczególnych okoliczności. Powyższa lista nie obejmuje wszystkich potencjalnych wydatków.

Zweryfikowane usługi, których możesz potrzebować

We focus on working with Local professional agencies to decrease the cost of your operations. You can work with Big 4, or experience the same quality with lower fees.

No service providers found.

Zapytanie o więcej informacji

Questions that you should know...

No FAQs available for this opportunity.

Znajdź możliwości w różnych branżach:

Zastrzeżenia Autor: najafi.capital

This content has been prepared by or on behalf of an associate of Najafi Capital (“Najafi”) and is provided solely for informational purposes. Nothing contained herein constitutes, or should be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor a recommendation to subscribe for, acquire, or dispose of any investment or investment strategy.

Information presented on this page is based on materials and data provided by the project owner or issuer of the relevant investment opportunity and is used by Najafi as part of its project screening and high-level due diligence process. While Najafi believes such information to have been obtained from sources deemed reliable, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of such information. Najafi expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, legality, or completeness of information provided by the project owner or for any subsequent updates or statements made by such parties.

Najafi does not provide investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice and does not act in a fiduciary capacity. Prospective investors are solely responsible for conducting their own independent due diligence and for verifying all information relevant to any investment decision.

Investing in private market opportunities involves substantial risk, including the potential loss of all invested capital, illiquidity, and the absence of any guarantee of returns or distributions. Prospective investors should carefully evaluate these risks and consult with their own independent financial, legal, tax, and accounting advisors to determine whether any investment is suitable in light of their individual circumstances. (Last Update: January 2026)

pl_PLPolish
Investment Finder Wizard

Kreator wyszukiwania inwestycji

Obsługiwane przez Google GemniAI, kontrolowane przez ekspertów

Jaki jest Twój główny cel Inwestycyjny?

Wielkość inwestycji

W jakiej branży?

Które kraje preferujesz?

Możesz określić region lub opisać go terminami takimi jak „kraje germańskie”, „kraje o łagodnej pogodzie”...

Twój dostosowany plan inwestycyjny jest już w drodze!

Wkrótce nasz zespół przeanalizuje Twoje cele i preferencje inwestycyjne, aby zapewnić Ci kompleksowy raport przedstawiający idealne jurysdykcje, strategie inwestycyjne i potencjalne możliwości dostosowane do wybranych branż. Bądź na bieżąco, aby uzyskać wnikliwe wskazówki dostosowane do Twoich konkretnych potrzeb.